Warning
This page is located in archive.

Evaluation and Terms

The deadlines are specified in the upload system.

After all the agents (players) are uploaded, there will be three round robin tournaments played. Players will then be ranked according to their profit. The winner is the player which accrued the most points.

Evaluated category min max note
03_PD
The ability to play 2 6 We accept even the simplest player without intelligence, as long as the player can play, it receives 2 points. (If you do not turn in any player, you receive 0 points.) Up to another 4 points are given out according to based on the code quality. Legibility, quality of comments, elegance and creativity are all assessed.
04_PD
Advanced player 0 7 Player is able to use the game history to change its own strategy. This is meant to compensate for cases when overall population in tournament causes otherwise interesting code to fail. You can get up to 2 points from for history analysis, up to 2 points for payoff matrix analysis and up to 3 points for the code quality. (In case of exceptionally good code, you can receive up to 7 points.
Rank in basic tournament (where the payoff matrix is known beforehand) 1 4 The ranking will be divided quarters.
Rank in advanced tournament (where the payoff matrix is not known beforehand) 1 4 Just like the first tournament.
Rank in third tournament (where the payoff matrix is not known beforehand and it is quite different from the usual ones) 1 4 Just like the two tournaments before.
courses/ae4b99rph/labs/prisoners_dilemma/evaluation_and_terms.txt · Last modified: 2013/10/14 10:50 by svobodat